Cases 31 - 40 of 88
JOBE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08000
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JOBE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jobe v. Cheeks III
as 1:2019cv08518
Defendant:
HABBERT LEE CHEEKS III and Babbert Lee Cheeks III
Plaintiff:
YUSHUPA JOBE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 tm
BUFORD et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03236
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WEILAND, RYAN ROCKRIVER, RANDY LAWSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jobe v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03545
Plaintiff:
Chris Jobe
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buford et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02159
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Weiland, Ryan Rockriver, Randy Lawson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
JOBE v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv14641
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY C. JOBE
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jobe v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02131
Plaintiff:
Chris Jobe
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Homer v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11910
Plaintiff:
Melodie Homer, Douglas Halvorson, Jeanette Diehl and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Jobes et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03065
Plaintiff:
Homer Jobes and Mary Jobes
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Little III v. Grant County Hospital District #1
as 2:2018cv00292
Defendant:
RN Katherine Molthan, Jodee Sheats, Sally Schwab and others
Plaintiff:
Amos Rogers Little III and Amos Rogers Little, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
