Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Scotino et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Mary Scotino , Sheila Anderson , Ana E Calero and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cavnar et al v. Saxton Group Inc
as 5:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
Cayce Cavnar and Krissa Cavnar
Defendant:
Saxton Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Saxton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28522
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Saxton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saxton v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv22688
Plaintiff:
Tonya Jo Saxton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saxton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20039
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Saxton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Polk et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02223
Plaintiff:
Tonta R. Polk , Ervin Charles Pough , Marcus L. Pough and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
CHAMBERLAIN et al v. BOWEN
as 2:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
TABITHA CHAMBERLAIN and APRIL SAXTON
Defendant:
SCOTT ANDREW BOWEN and EAN HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Saxton et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01839
Plaintiff:
Barbara Saxton , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dale Adams v. Tyson Foods, et al
as 11-3180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Brent Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Leland E. Tollett, Exec, Albert C. Zapanta, Exec and others
SAXTON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv45820
Plaintiff:
JIM SAXTON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
