Cases 71 - 80 of 425
LEVINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51327
Plaintiff:
RENEE LEVINE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEVINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50297
Plaintiff:
LANE A LEVINE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levine v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02064
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Samuel Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levine v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00857
Defendant:
Connecticut CVS Pharmacy, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Fourstar Group USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Erin Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bobo v. Levin
as 4:2021cv00701
Defendant:
Alexandra Levin
Plaintiff:
Louise Bobo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levine v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03557
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLeod et al v. Kumin et al
as 1:2021cv10807
Defendant:
Jennifer L. Stier, Keith B. Gelb, Kenneth Howe and others
Plaintiff:
Karina McLeod, Mark McLeod and Fabiana Hillary McLeod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Levine v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00088
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
Ben Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levinn v. Colucci et al
as 1:2021cv10707
Defendant:
Esq. Darin Colucci and Colucci, Colucci, Marcus & Flavin, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Peter Levin, as POA of his mother Jill Levin and Mr. Peter Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lail et al v. Miami Air International, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
James Miller, Ronald Azucenas, Benny Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Miami Air International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
