Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clark v. Goodwin et al
as 1:2023cv03919
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Clark
Defendant:
Conner Goodwin, Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC and Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Clark v. Sandoz, Inc.
as 2:2019cv01748
Defendant:
Sandoz, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv03538
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CLARK and DOROTHY CLARK
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darlene Jordan et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02370
Plaintiff:
Darlene Jordan , Yvonne Esquivel , Evanetta Evans and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Darlene Jordan et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01928
Plaintiff:
Mary Armstrong, Wilihmena Arnold, Mable Beamon and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
CLARK v. INTERGY, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62780
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. CLARK and DOROTHY CLARK
Defendant:
INTERGY, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Wyeth et al
as 4:2008cv03125
Defendant:
Wyeth, Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Clark, Dorothy Clark and Dorothy Clark
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Clark v. Wyeth et al
as 0:2008cv04857
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Clark, Dorothy Clark and Dorothy Clark
Defendant:
Wyeth, Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
CLARK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67559
Plaintiff:
DAVID N CLARK and DOROTHY CLARK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
