Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ARMSTRONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65784
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMSTRONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv83894
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2019cv00377
Plaintiff:
Thomas Armstrong
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Downey v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv11650
Defendant:
Thomas Armstrong, National Education Association, Alden F Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Downey
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Downey v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv11651
Defendant:
Thomas Armstrong, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, AUSA Andrew E Lelling and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Downey
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Armstrong et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00799
Plaintiff:
Katherine L. Armstrong and Thomas Armstrong
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEL MAURO et al v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 2:2013cv02064
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DEL MAURO and JESSICA DEL MAURO
Defendant:
THOMAS ARMSTRONG, SUSSEX COUNTY GLASS COMPANY, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Booth et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Sasha Booth , Travis Booth , Curtis Bounds and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Booth et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00568
Plaintiff:
Sasha Booth , All Plaintiffs , Travis Booth and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
