Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
House of Royal Ball Bey Ministry v. Schneiderman & Sherman PC et al
as 2:2023cv12905
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage, LLC, Schneidermand & Sherman PC, Quicken Loans, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
House of Royal Ball Bey Ministry
Noel et al v. Cronan et al
as 1:2023cv12299
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel, Arnold G Noel, Jr., Bartley M. Noel and others
Defendant:
Paul M Cronan, Barthine Romelus, Brailey Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Meehan v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 22-1147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARON MEEHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC.
Rocket Mortgage, LLC v. Franke, et al.
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Rocket Mortgage, LLC and Quicken Loans, LLC
Defendant:
Sean Franke, Julie Franke and Wings & Wheels, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Kelly v. Rocket Mortgage LLC
as 6:2021cv01358
Plaintiff:
Danielle Kelly
Defendant:
ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC f/k/a QUICKEN LOANS, LLC, Rocket Mortgage LLC and Quicken Loans, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arturo Michael Amezcua v. Quicken Loans LLC
as 8:2021cv01231
Plaintiff:
Arturo Michael Amezcua and Arturo M Amezcua
Defendant:
Quicken Loans LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Quicken Loans, LLC
as 1:2020cv11898
Plaintiff:
Donna Carter
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quicken Loans Inc. v. Mason Dixon Contracting, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00089
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Dixon and Mason Dixon Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meehan v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00560
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharon Meehan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
