Cases 91 - 100 of 3,430
Porter v. Starks et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Christopher Starks, Mark S Watson, Natalie Bokota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Strogoteanu et al
as 0:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lamar James
Defendant:
Darren Mark Ficek, Mihai Strogoteanu and Taylor Joseph Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clark v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
The Charles Schwab Corporation, The Colorado Division of Securities, The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis (PS) v. Saint Anthony's Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Latonya Denise Davis, Curtis Meeks, Jr., Anita Jean Dilworth and others
Defendant:
Saint Anthony's Hospital, Heidit B. Lisa Patel, Lisa Heidit B. Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Mulcahey v. Chocolay, Township of et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mulcahey
Defendant:
Chocolay, Township of, Scott Jennings, Nicholas Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
