Cases 121 - 130 of 749
Doe I et al v. Valdes Lawn Care and Snow Removal LLC et al
as 0:2019cv02491
Plaintiff:
John Doe III, John Doe II and John Doe I
Defendant:
Valdes Lawn Care and Snow Removal LLC and Yoleisy Valdez-Gonzales
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04992
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04991
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04993
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Snyder v. Fish et al
as 1:2019cv01085
Defendant:
John Doe I-III, Trooper Lubrant and William Fish
Plaintiff:
Robert Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv00133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Padilla v. Geico Insurance Co. et al
as 2:2019cv00696
Defendant:
John G. Franchini, Kathleen Austin, Paul Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Maese Padilla
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Geico Insurance Co.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Leasing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Waters et al v. The City of Colstrip et al
as 1:2019cv00077
Defendant:
The City of Colstrip, Clint Heser and Steven Williams
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul Rollefson, Lorraine Waters and John Does I-XXX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2019cv03146
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS SAFETY SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
TROY BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
