Cases 11 - 20 of 172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
King Alvarez v. HUD, et al
as 22-3282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KING ANTHONY ALVAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a HUD, MARCIA FUDGE, Secretary of HUD, NADAB BYNUM, Director of Community Planning and Development at HUD Philadelphia Regional Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bynum et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05431
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bynum and William Crawford
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-60460
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Laura Bynum v. County of Siskiyou Board of Supervisors, et al
as 22-15649
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAURA BYNUM
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SISKIYOU BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Defendant / Appellant:
KIMBERLY R. OLSON
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
