Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Myron Grace v. Moneygram, et al
as 23-3065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON A. GRACE
Defendant / Appellee:
MONEYGRAM and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Grace et al v. Moneygram et al
as 1:2022cv01722
Plaintiff:
Myron Grace, Talib Rakhshanda and Rakhshanda Talib
Defendant:
Moneygram and CVS Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Garrick v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv05509
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert Garrick
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc., Arthur Jan Gela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cichowski Family v. CVS Health Corporation, CVS Health Solutions, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS RX Services, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Cichowski Family, Christine V. Cichowski, Kevin Cichowski and others
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, CVS Health Solutions, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS RX Services, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Kes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01396
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
