Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Canty et al v. Be Money Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02470
Plaintiff:
Brittany Canty, Terrance Knox and Dillon Welch
Defendant:
Be Money Inc., D/B/A DAYLIGHT,, D/B/A PATHWARD FINANCIAL, INC.. Mete Bank, Robert Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2667
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wells v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Angela Wells
Defendant:
Thomas Jones, Jennifer McCovery, Danarris Lovejoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv10449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Messer v. Canty et al
as 2:2021cv00778
Plaintiff:
Cecil Messer
Defendant:
Anpherne Canty, Brett Wadsworth, Alexander Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canty v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
as 2:2021cv03743
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B Canty an individual doing business as Freeland Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Transportation and PCL Civil Constructors Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CANTY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv02067
Plaintiff:
Tracy Canty
Not Classified By Court:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant:
PETER PANNOH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canty v. City of Montgomery, et al (CONSENT)
as 2:2020cv00332
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Ernest N. Finley, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Canty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
