Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 272
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00173
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Special Master: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nguyen et al v. Gwinnett County, Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv03800
Defendant: Huyen Nguyen, Gwinnett County, Georgia, DeKalb County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff: Buu Ho Nguyen and Lien Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe 1, et al v. William Thornbury, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-5609
Plaintiff / Appellee: JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN MINOR DOE 1, by and through his next friend, Jane Doe 1 and others
Defendant: WILLIAM C. THORNBURY, JR., MD, in his official capacity as the President of the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, et al.
Intervenor: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL DANIEL CAMERON
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALASKA and others
S.V. et al v. County of Riverside et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00860
Plaintiff: S. V., Naomi Bravo and Esteban Viramontes
Defendant: County of Riverside, Chad Bianco, Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LASSITER-COVINGTON et al v. TOWNSHIP OF HILLSIDE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv07461
Defendant: UNDERSHERIFF DENNIS BURKE, IN HIS OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, JOHN DOES #11-12 (AS YET UNIDENTIFIED UNION TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS OR OFFICERS), SHERIFF OFFICER OGRADY, IN HIS OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES and others
Plaintiff: NYISHA LASSITER-COVINGTON, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JERMAINE COVINGTON, NIJEE COVINGTON, A MINOR BY HIS GUARDIAN NYISHA LASSITER COVINGTON, NYISHA LASSITER-COVINGTON, INDIVIDUALLY and others
Cross Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF HILLSIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe 1 et al v. Thornbury et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Minor Doe 1 and others
Defendant: William C. Thornbury, Jr., Audria Denker and Eric Friedlander
Intervenor Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Amicus Curiae: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Pediatric Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oleg Varlitskiy v. Manny Campos, et al
as 23-55426
Plaintiff / Appellant: OLEG VARLITSKIY, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: DEPUTY SHERIFF MANNY CAMPOS, an individual, DEPUTY SHERIFF DANIEL BROWN, an individual, INVESTIGATOR THOMAS SALISBURY, an individual and others
Defendant: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a public entity and DOES, 7-10
Tanvir v. Comey
as 23-738
Plaintiff: Awais Sajjad
Plaintiff / Appellant: Muhammad Tanvir, Jameel Algibhah and Naveed Shinwari
Defendant / Appellee: James Comey, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, "John" Tanzin, Special Agent, FBI, Sanya Garcia, Special Agent FBI and others
Defendant: Rand Beers, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, John S. Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, Christopher M. Piehota, Director, Terrorist Screening Center and others
Kalpesh Solanki v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2023cv00711
Defendant: Officer Arana, Officer Bonilla, Officer T. Cho and others
Plaintiff: Kalpesh Solanki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuel D. Castro v. City of Whittier et al
as 2:2023cv03424
Plaintiff: Samuel D Castro and Samuel D. Castro
Defendant: City of Whittier, Whittier Police Department, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?