Cases 11 - 20 of 116
Kelty v. Walla Walla County et al
as 4:2023cv05165
Plaintiff:
Ryan Kelty
Defendant:
Walla Walla County, Rebecca Groom, John Liger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Franklin County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Franklin County Board of Commissioners, Commissioner John O'Grady, Kevin L Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quintero et al v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Quintero, Austen Letrick and RV Main, LLC
Defendant:
City of Medford, Ben Lytle, Ryan Groom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Grooms v. Privette et al
as 6:2023cv03287
Defendant:
Alice Bell, Steven A. Privette, Alice Privette and others
Plaintiff:
Betty Grooms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
