Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Perez v. The Otis R. Bowen Center for Human Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez
Defendant:
Officer J. James, Officer C. Harruff, The Otis R. Bowen Center for Human Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. BUENO et al
as 1:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL J JAMES
Defendant:
ERIC BUENO, RANDALL LIBERTY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benge v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 16-5108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY BENGE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA EX REL. TULSA POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. TULSA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LARRY G. MARK and others
Bergeron v. James et al
as 1:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Robert J. James, David McDade, Benjamin Von Schuch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Benge v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
Larry Benge
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, State of Oklahoma , Larry G Mark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05481
Defendant:
City of New York, Jason Forgione, James Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. The City of New York
as 1:2013cv01768
Plaintiff:
Wayne J. James
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
James et al v. Harlingen Family Dentistry, Series, PLLC et al
as 7:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Haydn J. James , Mary L. James and Katrina S. James
Defendant:
Harlingen Family Dentistry, Series PLLC and Juan D. Villareal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES v. VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION
as 1:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
NORMA J. JAMES
Defendant:
VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01571
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
