Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Tolliver v. City of Syracuse
as 16-3176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Tolliver
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Syracuse, William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Onondaga County, Michael A. Price, Assistant District Attorney, Onondaga County and others
Tolliver v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
Eric Tolliver
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, William J. Fitzpatrick, Michael A. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Tormey et al
as 5:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Walker and Nancy Rodriguez Walker
Defendant:
Tormey, William J. Fitzpatrick, Melinda McGunnigle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FITZPATRICK v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2014cv06118
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, C. CHRISTIE, STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cayo v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 3:2013cv30113
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cayo
Defendant:
Darrin J Fitzpatrick, James Kelly, David Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaughnessy v. State of New York et al
as 5:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Shaughnessy
Defendant:
State of New York, County of Onondaga, William J. Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 2:2012cv02938
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Brian Fitzpatrick, Dianne Fitzpatrick and Gold Mountain Winery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
