Cases 11 - 20 of 21
(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. El Dorado County Judicial Court Seizures et al
as 2:2020cv01173
Defendant:
James Marshall, Ben Alvarez, Kassie Cardullo and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Proffitt v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
Andrew Proffitt
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, Donald Oakes, Jason Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopper v. Logsdon et al (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
James Marshall Hopper
Defendant:
Eric Logsdon, Robert Monrow, Jeff Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Compitello et al
as 1:2015cv00750
Defendant:
Sean Bauer, Michael Compitello and John and Jane Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
James Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Kirby v. City of East Wenatchee, et al
as 13-35544
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL KIRBY
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF EAST WENATCHEE and JAMES MARSHALL, Officer
Kirby v. East Wenatchee, City of et al
as 2:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Michael Kirby
Defendant:
East Wenatchee, City of and James Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hubbard v. City Of Athens, Tennessee et al
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Patricia Hubbard
Defendant:
City Of Athens, Tennessee, Adam Green and James Marshall Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv07344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Castillo v. Marshall et al
as 1:2007cv01298
Plaintiff:
Bernice Castillo
Defendant:
James Marshall, Fred Radosevich and Town of Bernalillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
