Cases 11 - 20 of 51
ALVARADO v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv18574
Defendant:
Nate Pino, JOHN DOE 1-50, Curtis Catalano and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv02328
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L.G. Johnson and Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit, Central Intelligence Agency, United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv01694
Defendant:
Allan D. Lourie, United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson and Jeffrey L.G. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Morris et al
as 3:2019cv00902
Defendant:
Tyler Schulz, Phillip Ciccone, Richard Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Eubanks et al
as 3:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wood
Defendant:
Chad Eubanks, Mario Troutman, Jr., Cherish Steiger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ernest Brown , Michael Russell , Ernest Lewis and others
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LOCKLEAR v. HERALD et al
as 4:2016cv00085
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., NADIR AL-SHAMI, JEREMY ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
ELAINE LOCKLEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2015cv01538
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BARACK OBAMA, STATE OF MISSOURI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
