Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv02868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robinson v. State of Maryland Department of the Environment, et al.
as 1:2013cv02234
Plaintiff:
James R. Robinson , Duwain Heim , Rick Gardner and others
Defendant:
CBAC Gaming, LLC , State of Maryland Department of the Environment , Robert Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Robinson v. SAIF et al
as 3:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
James William Robinson
Defendant:
SAIF, Starplex/CMS and Workers Comp Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DUNCAN et al
as 7:2011cv00143
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ROBINSON, JR
Defendant:
JEREMY DUNCAN, Travis Sparks, CARL DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Burba et al
as 2:2010cv01011
Plaintiff:
James M Robinson
Defendant:
Michael Burba and Ryan Nagucki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Collins v. Shinseki et al
as 2:2010cv02056
Plaintiff:
Leandrew G. Collins
Defendant:
Erick Shinseki and James L. Robinson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Robinson v. Washington County, et al
as 09-35254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON COUNTY, State of Oregon, SHAWN BLALACH, Washington County Police Officer, CITY OF BEAVERTON and others
Robinson v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2009cv00506
Plaintiff:
James E Robinson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, C. M. Huertas and S. A. Difranco
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv04066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
