Cases 11 - 20 of 107
MCCURDY v. TOWN OF BRUNSWICK et al
as 2:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
PRESCOTT MCCURDY
Defendant:
TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, JOHN ELDRIDGE, COMMANDER HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gray v. MS Dept of Rehabilitation Svc
as 22-60411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gwendolyn Gray and Clell O. McCurdy
Defendant / Appellee:
Mississppi Department of Rehabilitation Services and Mississippi Department of Rehabilitation Services
McCurdy v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Kijaun Sanchez McCurdy
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Gray et al v. Mississppi Department of Rehabilitation Services
as 3:2021cv00710
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Gray and Clell O. McCurdy
Defendant:
Mississppi Department of Rehabilitation Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCurdy v. Woodgrain, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Kristen McCurdy
Defendant:
Woodgrain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv07404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garin et al v. Sumang et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Lianna McCurdy, Gail Garin, Daniel Verderame and others
Defendant:
Doe Non-Profit Entities 1-10, Alins Sumang, Doe Joint Ventures 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
