Cases 11 - 20 of 282
Lesly Pompy v. First Merchants Bank, et al
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
LESLY POMPY, President, Interventional Pain Management Associates, PC
Defendant:
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK, fka Monroe Bank & Trust, MARC MOORE, Lt., Mantis, BRIAN BISHOP, Agent, Diversion Investigator, DEA and others
Hebrard v. Does
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hebrard
Defendant:
Does Frank, Store Manager, Boll Well Pawn Store #3; Alexander, Merchant/Tender, Store #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Miles v. Raoul et al
as 1:2024cv01914
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Miles
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Nathalina A. Hudson, Pamela Blackorby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
