Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Waters v. Hughes
as 1:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Tammy Waters
Defendant:
The City of Geneva , Michael Hughes and Stephanie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry-Bey et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv00215
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Perry-Bey and Ronald M. Green
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Angela J. Miller, T. Christian Herren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Zaruba v. Hughes
as 3:2010cv00555
Defendant:
Michael Hughes
Plaintiff:
Shiela Zaruba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. County et al
as 1:2009cv05193
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes, Michael Hughes and Michael Hughes
Defendant:
Cook County, Thomas Dart and Deputy Officer Spears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. St Paul, City of et al
as 0:2009cv00461
Plaintiff:
Michael Hugh Kelly and Michael Hugh Kelly
Defendant:
St Paul, City of, St Paul, City of, St Paul, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aifang Shi v. Ruth Carlson, et al
as 09-15033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AIFANG SHI
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH E. CARLSON, JON M. STEVENS, MICHAEL HUGHES and others
Kelly v. Malmgren et al
as 0:2008cv04218
Plaintiff:
Michael Hugh Kelly, Michael Hugh Kelly and Michael Hugh Kelly
Defendant:
Dan Malmgren, Cory Tell, Sgt. Peck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shi v. Central Arizona College et al
as 2:2007cv01147
Plaintiff:
Aifang Shi
Defendant:
Central Arizona College, Ruth E Carlson, Jon M Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
