Cases 11 - 20 of 6,217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Catoosa County Republican Party et al v. Catoosa County Board of Elections and Voter Registration et al
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Catoosa County Republican Party and Joannna Hildreath
Defendant:
Catoosa County Board of Elections and Voter Registration, Tommy Davis, Ron McKelvy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEVENS-NUNEZ v. BRISTOL BOROUGH MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2024cv01678
Plaintiff:
KAREN MARIE STEVENS-NUNEZ
Defendant:
BRISTOL BOROUGH MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, JAMES DILLON, CHIEF JOSEPH MOORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Moore v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv01600
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Moore
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, Deputy Jesse Patterson, Deputy Unknown Sheriff Deputy One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
David Ermold, et al v. Kim Davis
as 24-5524
Plaintiff:
DAVID ERMOLD and DAVID MOORE
Defendant:
KIM DAVIS, Individually
Clouse v. Southern Methodist Univ
as 24-10461
Plaintiff:
Jessica Clouse, Lindsay Heyman, Meghan Klein and others
Defendant:
Southern Methodist University
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
