Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Patrick Grider, et al v. City of Auburn, AL, et al
as 11-12099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK JAMES GRIDER, DANIEL JOSEPH GRIDER and THE FOURTH QUARTER, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AUBURN, AL, WILLIAM HAM, JR., JAMES TREY NEAL, III and others
Patrick McNamara v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 10-2356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK JAMES MCNAMARA
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Division of Child Support Enforcement
mcnamara v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2010cv00782
Plaintiff:
Patrick James McNamara
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of San Antonio, et al.
as 5:2010cv00274
Defendant:
Officer FELIPE RAMOS, City of San Antonio, Officer ALFRED A GONZALES and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dougherty et al v. MCDANIEL et al
as 3:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Dougherty, Elizabeth Ann Dougherty, Patrick James Cavanaugh, Jr. and others
Defendant:
E.K. MCDANIEL, Debra Brooks, Adam Endel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grider et al v. City of Auburn, Alabama et al
as 3:2007cv01031
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Grider, Patrick James Grider, Daniel Joseph Grider and others
Defendant:
City of Auburn, Alabama, William Ham, Jr., James Trey Neal, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
