Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Miller et al v. Village of Maywood Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv06171
Defendant:
DSHAUN BOLDEN, DONNA LEWIS, UNKNOWN OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MILLER and DORRIS MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tasciotti et al v. Haffmans et al
as 1:2020cv00671
Defendant:
Anthony Mattola, Richard Miller, Albert Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Samein Capps-Tasciotti, John Dermgrdichian, Michelle Anne Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Comfort et al
as 1:2019cv01252
Plaintiff:
Richard Miller
Defendant:
Unknown Police Forensic Specialists, Douglas A. Comfort and A. K. Skowronski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hellmuth v. City of Trenton, Ohio et al
as 1:2019cv00258
Defendant:
Richard Miller, Ryan Montgomery, City of Trenton, Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Hellmuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
BUXTON v. DOUGHERTY et al
as 2:2018cv00546
Plaintiff:
CARL BUXTON
Defendant:
IVA C. DOUGHERTY, KATIE WYMARD, RICHARD MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Liebbe v. Dallas Independent School District et al
as 3:2016cv02413
Defendant:
Dallas Independent School District , Craig Richard Miller and Floyd Mike Miles
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Liebbe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
