Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Davetta Range v. Jeff Bezos
as 20-1349
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney/Owns TP USA, BLACK LIVES MATTER TORONTO, TURNING POINT USA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVETTA LYNN RANGE
Range v. Van Metre et al
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Stacey, Magistrate Judge Michael Nachmanoff and others
Plaintiff:
Davetta Lynn Range
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tyler v. Livingston County et al
as 1:2017cv01226
Plaintiff:
Stephen Tyler
Defendant:
Livingston County, Judith Cremer, Paul Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thissel et al v. Murphy et al
as 3:2015cv05937
Plaintiff:
Jihan Shawar Thissel , Tony Lee Matthews, Jr. , Sidney Thissel and others
Defendant:
Cameron Murphy, City of Salinas Police Department, City of Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01552
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Cumberland County, Tennesse et al
as 2:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Cumberland County, Tennesse , Butch Burgess , Dustin Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Cumberland County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Cumberland County, Tennessee , Butch Burgess , Dustin Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tony Smith v. Stephen Connell, et al
as 13-17278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN CONNELL, Police Officer, JEFFREY KINSLER, Police Officer, TREVOR HAYES and others
Blasingim v. Interventional Pain Specialist
as 5:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Blasingim
Defendant:
Interventional Pain Specialist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
