Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Caudle v. Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) et al
as 5:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Housing for Urban Development (HUD) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) et al
as 3:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), Citizenship & Immigration Services (CIS), Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alenezi v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2021cv01089
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Antony Blinken, United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and others
Plaintiff:
Salem DH O Alenezi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bamba v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS-FPS)
as 1:2019cv08646
Plaintiff:
Miankanze Bamba
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS-FPS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
David Donatoni v. Dept. of Homeland Security
as 16-1513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID DONATONI
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS)
Sai v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv01024
Plaintiff:
Sai
Defendant:
David Smith, Jim Adams, Champagne Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
