Cases 11 - 20 of 150
Cohen v. Iowa City, Iowa et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Emily Cohen
Defendant:
Iowa City, Iowa, Johnson County Sheriff's Department, Johnson County, Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Gabler v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Paul E Gabler, II
Respondent:
United States of America, General Merrick Garland, State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1996
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cohen (PS) v. Howard et al
as 1:2023cv02221
Plaintiff:
Emily Cohen
Defendant:
Stephen Howard, Dinsmore Tuttle, Michael Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith (PS) et al v. WCDTF et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Nathan J Smith and Holly M Smith
Defendant:
WCDTF, GJPD, Sherrifs Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
