Cases 21 - 30 of 246
Feiner v. Goclowski et al
as 3:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Matthew Feiner
Defendant:
Eric Goclowski, Gregg Curran, Derrick Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Austin, et al v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 22-2856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT A. AUSTIN and RAAPOETRY LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and BRIAN CURRAN, Psychologist, Cook County Circuit Court Forensic Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv19970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STAPLES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv02118
Plaintiff:
MYISHA STAPLES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dubro v. Dubro et al
as 4:2022cv02975
Plaintiff:
Katherine M Dubro
Defendant:
Dennis Dubro, Mark Cederborg, George McNitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City of Rockford, Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv50145
Plaintiff:
Denise Davis
Defendant:
City of Rockford, Illinois and Anthony Curran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Jean Ronado
Defendant:
Steven Troy Marshall, Christopher John England, Patricia Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
