Cases 21 - 30 of 431
Tanner v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Linda Diane Tanner
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tanner v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Linda Diane Tanner
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jermall Brown v. BOCSE McGuire, Esq.
as 23-2110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMALL BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
BOCSE MCGUIRE, ESQ., MARTIN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY, RONIKA SUMLIN, Magistrate and others
Mealey et al v. City of Baton Rouge / Parish of East Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Carrie Mealey and Houston Lawrence
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, Troy Lawrence, Jr., Murphy J. Paul, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allen v. Linn County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2023cv02453
Plaintiff:
James Rocky Allen
Defendant:
Linn County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners, Kevin Friend, Bobby Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowersock v. Matherly et al
as 1:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Trina Bowersock
Defendant:
Brittany Matherly, Sara Green, Aubrey Falligos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2877
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Isom
as 4:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Tanner Smith
Defendant:
Haven Isom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
