Cases 21 - 30 of 456
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Herrera v. Acevedo
as 23-20235
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Domingo Herrera
Defendant / Appellant:
Art Acevedo, Officer B. Tien, Officer T. Seagler and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Acevedo v. Duncan-Walker et al
as 4:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Nancy Acevedo
Defendant:
Sueann Duncan-Walker and Janet L. Yellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Acevedo et al v. Mattioli et al
as 2:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jose Acevedo and Estate of Joel Acevedo
Defendant:
Michael A Mattioli, Robert Roach and Alfonso Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Huppert v. Prince William Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Evangelina Huppert
Defendant:
Prince William Police Department, J. Acevedo-ortiz, J.R. Walsh-Steines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
