Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Wilson v. Texas Christian University et al
as 3:2020cv00106
Defendant:
Dr. Fredrick Gooding, Dr. Diane Snow, Russell Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe No.1, Jane Doe No 1, Destinee Wilson and others
Petitioner:
Megan Pickens
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Campbell v. Bennett et al
as 0:2019cv00973
Defendant:
Ms. Christa T. Bell, Mr. David B. Love, South Carolina Bar and others
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawes v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2018cv00357
Defendant:
Shaquala Douglas, Nevada, State of and Mary McCarthy
Plaintiff:
Samuel W. Dawer and Samuel Dawes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dawes v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2017cv01424
Plaintiff:
Mary Dawes , Alfredo Saucedo and Virgilio Rosales
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Christopher Hess and Jason Kimpel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROOKS v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv03700
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. BROOKS
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN DARDZINSKI, EDWARD BUDDIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Whitehurst, et al v. Thomas Cougill, et al
as 17-20302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY WHITEHURST and ANTHONY WHITEHURST, on behalf of his Minor child M.W.
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS L. COUGILL, CHARLES T. MIERS, RICHARD SIMSES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
