Cases 21 - 30 of 147
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Mays et al v. The Cabell County Board of Education et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Herman Mays, Jr., C. M., Elizabeth Mays and others
Defendant:
The Cabell County Board of Education, Ryan Saxe and Daniel Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHADWICK et al v. CROUSORE et al
as 1:2021cv02921
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN J. CHADWICK and C. M. C.
Defendant:
BRETT CROUSORE, BRIAN ATKINSON and JIM BERISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv08362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Danielle Bey v. Centralized Infractions Bureau et al
as 1:2021cv03884
Plaintiff:
Malka Yasmin Danielle Bey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Centralized Infractions Bureau, Georgia Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
MARKFERDING SENIOR et al v. MARKFERDING et al
as 2:2021cv12860
Plaintiff:
DAVID L MARKFERDING SENIOR, D. C. M., D. L. M. JUNIOR and others
Defendant:
FRANCIS NICOTRA, DELLA M MARKFERDING, MARIE MARIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
