Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Bennett et al v. City Of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Aristolis Bennett, Aristacia Bennett and Alfricka Bennett
Defendant:
City Of Fayetteville , Christopher Hunt , Michael D. Bohannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Estate of Laliah Swayzer et al v. Clarke et al
as 2:2016cv01703
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Laliah Swayzer , Shade Swayzer , Diane Ruffin and others
Defendant:
David J Clarke, Jr, Richard E. Schmidt, CO Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Special Master:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maria Muniz-Muniz, et al v. United States Border Patrol, et al
as 16-3400
Plaintiff:
MARIA MUNIZ-MUNIZ, ROBERTO MUNIZ, ANTONIO TORRES-FRANCO and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OHIO IMMIGRANT WORKER PROJECT and FARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, JOHN DOES 19-21, individually and in their official capacities as Norwalk Ohio Police Department officers and JOHN DOES 1-9, in their capacity as United States Border Patrol Agents assigned or working from the Sandusky, Ohio Border Patrol Station
Defendant:
RANDY GALLEGOS, JOHN DOES 1-15, individually and in their capacity as United States Border Patrol Agents assigned or working from the Sandusky, Ohio United States Border Patrol Station, BRADLEY SHAVER and others
Robinson v. Baker et al
as 7:2016cv02797
Plaintiff:
Marcia Robinson
Defendant:
Trevor Baker, Orra Wood, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gwendolyn Smalls v. James Binner
as 16-1385
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GWENDOLYN SMALLS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linwood Raymond Lambert, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
CHIEF OF POLICE JAMES W. BINNER, Colonel, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPURTY CHIEF OF POLICE BRIAN K LOVELACE, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #2, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #3, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department and others
Gwendolyn Smalls v. James Binner
as 16-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GWENDOLYN SMALLS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linwood Raymond Lambert, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF OF POLICE JAMES W. BINNER, Colonel, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPURTY CHIEF OF POLICE BRIAN K LOVELACE, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #2, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #3, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eric S. Clark v. County of Fairfax, Virginia
as 15-1705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC S. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA, RICHARD W. NAGEL, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia, R. L. DAVIS, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia and others
MILLER et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv00288
Defendant:
THOMPSON, JOHN DOE #5, MR. MICHEAL LEFEBVRE and others
Plaintiff:
MILLER, CHERYL ANN MILLER and ROBERT STEVEN BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
