Cases 21 - 30 of 180
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Caudle v. AT&T Inc et al
as 5:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, T Mobile AG, Apple Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. The Hertz Corporation, et al
as 22-6092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HERTZ CORPORATION and LYNN SPAETH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cofield et al v. Worktime, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield, Laverne Thompson and Dr. Keenan Cofield
Defendant:
Kayla Nedd, The Progressive Corporation, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Progressive Insurance and Claims Company, State of Maryland, Progressive Insurance the Progressive Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hertz Corporation The et al
as 5:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Hertz Corporation The and Lynn Spaeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
