Cases 21 - 30 of 88
James v. The City of Chattanooga, Tennessee et al
as 1:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Lance Hughes, The City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv02082
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Makeen Investment Group, LLC et al v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2019cv00378
Plaintiff:
Makeen Investment Group, LLC and Akeem Makeen
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Max A. Minnig, Jr, Michael James Vallejos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fair Housing Justice Center, Inc. et al v. New Property Associates, LLC et al
as 7:2018cv08605
Defendant:
New Property Associates, LLC and Dikson Dumitrescu
Plaintiff:
Michael James, Bianca Jones, Fair Housing Justice Center, Inc. and others
Campbell v. Knipper et al (PLR1)
as 2:2018cv00085
Plaintiff:
Michael James Campbell
Defendant:
James Knipper, Linsey Lane, Mickey Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Brubaker, et al v. City of Tucson, et al
as 18-15742
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD BRUBAKER and BARBARA STAPLETON
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF TUCSON, a municipal corporation, JACK WOOLRIDGE and MICHAEL JAMES PELTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
