Cases 21 - 30 of 38
v. DeSocio et al
as 5:2018cv00302
Defendant:
Catherine Leahy Scott, Officer Babcock, L. Jones and others
Claimant:
Richard DeSocio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joshua Rodriguez v. City of West Covina et al
as 2:2017cv00138
Defendant:
City of West Covina, Corporal Del Haro, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rodriguez
RIVERA v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2016cv05308
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RIVERA
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK , NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT , NEWARK POLICE OFFICER D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barr v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2016cv05266
Plaintiff:
Kevin Barr
Defendant:
City Of New York, Police Officer Robert Miller and John Doe Police Officer ##1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen Campbell v. Officer Christopher Miller
as 16-1502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWEN CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER MILLER
Nelson v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00234
Plaintiff:
Tyson Nelson
Defendant:
City Of New York, Police Officer Jason Miller, Police Officer Rudy Lahens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Miller (Shield No. 2120) et al
as 1:2015cv10028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ransom
Defendant:
Police Officer Jason Miller (Shield No. 2120), Police Officer Matthew Regina (2389) and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Miller
as 1:2015cv01623
Plaintiff:
Owen Campbell
Defendant:
Officer Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stephen Rouse v. Austin Police Department, et al
as 15-51089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN E. ROUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TRAVIS COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and others
Rouse v. Austin Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv00721
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Rouse
Defendant:
Austin Police Department, Housing Authority of the City of Austin, Travis County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
