Cases 21 - 30 of 252
O'Connor v. Peck et al
as 4:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Rory S O'Connor
Defendant:
Officer Gregory Peck and Officer Paul Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. City of Lamar et al
as 1:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
John Kelly Owens
Defendant:
City of Lamar, The, Austin Peck, Thomas Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Casada v. Peck et al
as 6:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
James Ray Casada
Defendant:
Harry Peck, City of Merriam Woods and Harry Peek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Vaccaro v. Dodd et al
as 8:2022cv02627
Plaintiff:
Nicholas T. Vaccaro
Defendant:
Larry Alan Dodd, Sergio Luciano, Brianna Doan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baez v. Peck et al
as 1:2022cv01769
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Baez
Defendant:
ChristyLee L. Peck, United States (FTCA), Prime Care Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Cache County et al
as 1:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Doug Williams
Defendant:
Cache County, D. Chad Jensen, Lower Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Li v. Connecticut
as 22-2863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dongmei Li
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Connecticut and others
Wolfe v. Peck et al
as 1:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
John Philip Wolfe
Defendant:
ChristyLee L. Peck, Caleb Bartlett, Nicole Vito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
