Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 118
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff: VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant: CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michigan Welfare Rights Organization, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 22-7164
Plaintiff / Appellee: Michigan Welfare Rights Organization, Maureen Taylor, Nicole Hill and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donald J. Trump, in his personal capacity
Defendant / Appellee: Donald J. Trump For President, Inc. and Republican National Committee
EAKIN et al v. ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff: BETTY EAKIN, INES MASSELLA, FETTERMAN FOR PA and others
Defendant: ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor: DAVID BALL, JAMES D. BEE, DEBRA BIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SUTHERLAND v. SAVE AMERICA PAC et al
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff: RALEIGH SUTHERLAND
Defendant: SAVE AMERICA PAC, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. CHAPMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS and others
Defendant: LEIGH M. CHAPMAN, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor: DAVID BALL, JAMES D. BEE, DEBRA BIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC v. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, et al
as 1:2022cv02505
Defendant: Maryland, Grace Communion International, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and others
Plaintiff: Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC, Christina J. Bostick, C.B.T. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Democratic National Committee et al v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2022cv01369
Plaintiff: Democratic National Committee and Arizona Democratic Party
Defendant: Katie Hobbs and Mark Brnovich
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DONDIEGO et al v. LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv02111
Plaintiff: MARCIA DAY DONDIEGO, RUTHANN BAUSCH, JUDITH REED and others
Defendant: LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and LEIGH M. CHAPMAN
Intervenor Plaintiff: NICK MILLER
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and JARRETT COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Republican National Committee v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 22-5123
Plaintiff / Appellant: Republican National Committee
Defendant / Appellee: Nancy Pelosi, in her official capacity as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chair of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, Elizabeth Cheney, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol and others
Amicus Curiae: National Republican Senatorial Committee
Vote.org et al v. Georgia State Election Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01734
Plaintiff: Vote.org, Georgia Alliance for Retired Americans and Priorities USA
Defendant: Georgia State Election Board, Edward Lindsey, Janice W. Johnston and others
Intervenor Defendant: Georgia Republican Party Inc. and Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?