Cases 21 - 30 of 1,171
Boylan v. Wardlaw et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Timothy T Boylan, Jr
Defendant:
Brandon D Wardlaw, Adam Barnett, Timothy Distasio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE v. KEYSTONE FIRST et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
KEYSTONE FIRST, KEYSTONE FAMILY HEALTH PLAN, VISTA HEALTH PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Pigott v. Gintz
as 23-30879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wesley Pigott, on his own behalf and on behalf of his minor child K.P. and Mya Pigott
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Gintz, Shield No. 91581
Abdurakhmanov v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv08851
Plaintiff:
Laziz Abdurakhmanov
Defendant:
City of New York, PO Jonathan Santiago, Shield 9174, PO Michael B. Loughery, Shield 23070 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY v. ARSENIS et al
as 3:2023cv22822
Plaintiff:
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, SPEECH & LANGUAGE CENTER, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
