Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 9,715
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00676
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cervini v. Cisneros
as 24-50442
Plaintiff: Eric Cervini, Wendy Davis, David Gins and others
Defendant: Eliazar Cisneros, Joeylynn Mesaros, Robert Mesaros and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02409
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Abdikarim v. Williams et al
as 0:2024cv02059
Plaintiff: Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant: Hunter Williams and John Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Alabama Power Company et al
as 2:2024cv00701
Plaintiff: Vincent Edward Davis
Defendant: Alabama Power Company, I Ripon Britton, Jr, Tammie Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luis Martinez, Sr., et al v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1474
Plaintiff: LUIS ANTONIO MARTINEZ, SR., ANA MARTINEZ DE JESUS, YARITZA MARTINEZ DE JESUS and others
Defendant: WAYNE COUNTY, MI, a municipal corporation, DR. CARL J. SCHMIDT, acting in his official and individual capacities, DR. LEIGH HLAVATY and others
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff: James Harris
Defendant: Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Fink v. Jonathan Bishop, et al
as 24-2001
Plaintiff: JOHN W. FINK
Defendant: JONATHAN L. BISHOP, KAYDON A. STANZIONE, JOSEPH M. TROUPE, JR. and others
David Ermold, et al v. Kim Davis
as 24-5524
Plaintiff: DAVID ERMOLD and DAVID MOORE
Defendant: KIM DAVIS, Individually
Davis v. Barrett et al
as 1:2024cv00881
Plaintiff: Rafiyq Davis
Defendant: Joseph A. Barrett, Attorney Danielle Morrison and Attorney Nicole Leach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?