Cases 31 - 40 of 53
John Tatar v. William Mayer, et al
as 13-2196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN J. TATAR
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM R. MAYER, JAMES LITTLE, DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE and others
Kovalovsky v. Defense Finance Accouting Service
as 6:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
Michael Kovalovsky
Defendant:
Defense Finance Accounting Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00687
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
BILLINGS v. ADVANCED BUSINESS ACCOUNTING SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2013cv00682
Defendant:
ADVANCED BUSINESS ACCOUNTING SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
EDDIE HAROLD BILLINGS, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tindal v. Accounts Receivable Eagan Accounting Services
as 3:2013cv01684
Plaintiff:
Concordia D. Tindal
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Eagan Accounting Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tatar v. Mayer et al
as 2:2012cv14814
Plaintiff:
John J Tatar
Defendant:
William R Mayer, James Little, Defense Finance and Accounting Services and others
Taylor v. 144th Fighter Wing, et .al.
as 2:2012cv02466
Defendant:
144th Fighter Wing, California Air National Guard, California National Guard and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Taylor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Gary Taylor v. 144th FIGHTER WING et al
as 2:2012at01312
Defendant:
144th FIGHTER WING, California Air National Guard, California National Guard and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Taylor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
v. 144th Fighter Wing et al
as 2:2012at01289
Defendant:
144th Fighter Wing, California Air National Guard, California National Guard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Debra Roach v. Robert Gate
as 12-1752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBRA ROACH, a/k/a Debra Jarama Roach
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense
Defendant:
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
