Cases 31 - 40 of 2,058
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Varner et al v. CPS/CCDFS et al
as 2:2024cv00341
Defendant:
Teresa Tibbs, CPS/CCDFS, Bobbie and others
Plaintiff:
Khari Varner, Tera Strawter, K.L.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loper et al v. Lukis et al
as 1:2024cv20604
Plaintiff:
Council President ELIZABETH A LOPER, Alderman KEITH J BLACK, Alderman KATHLEEN M GROSS and others
Defendant:
Commissioner PATRICIA PETRONE, Ashley Lukis, Michelle Anchors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Paula Carrie Rogers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Bobby Davis, Tina Durham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Zukerberg
as 0:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Zukerberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
