Cases 31 - 40 of 193
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Khan v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2022cv04406
Plaintiff:
Dr. Fauzia Khan, DDS and Fauzia Khan
Defendant:
COUNTY OF COOK a municipal corporation, Dr. Jorelle R Alexander, Dr. Kahina Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Grissom v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Grissom
Defendant:
Dental Assistant Jones, Dental Assistant R Sobrito, DDS Charles R Utley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grissom v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Grissom
Defendant:
Dental Assistant Jones, Dental Assistant R. Sobrito, Charles R. Utley, DDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
