Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Hupp et al v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Association et al
as 5:2015cv01693
Plaintiff:
Paul Hupp and Aristea Hupp
Defendant:
Solera Oak Valley Greens Association, Keystone Pacific Property Management Inc, Judith Paige McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adame et al v. McLane
as 4:2015cv02175
Plaintiff:
Robert Adame, Steven Alvarez, Paul Ayala and others
Defendant:
Marsha McLane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiang v. Porter et al
as 4:2015cv01008
Plaintiff:
Xiu Hui "Joseph" Jiang
Defendant:
Tonya Levette Porter , Jaimie D. Pitterle , City of St. Louis Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goldsberry et al v. Wiggins et al
as 8:2014cv01876
Plaintiff:
Louise Goldsberry and Craig Dorris
Defendant:
Matt Wiggins, Michael Jackson, Mike Schwieterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorris v. Robertson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2014cv01202
Plaintiff:
Donna Rae Dorris
Defendant:
Robertson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Gibson
as 6:2014cv00484
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Loretta Ann Gibson, Melbourne Police Officers, Pat Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Daratony et al v. Giordano et al
as 4:2013cv00168
Plaintiff:
Richard Jude Daratony
Defendant:
Gerry Giordano, Law Firm of Feulner, Dorris and Giordano, Fidelity National Financial and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
