Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
C.R.N.H. v. Nebus et al
as 9:2015cv80480
Plaintiff:
C.R.N.H.
Defendant:
Dennis Nebus , Jeffrey Gillen and Sheriff of Palm Beach County Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillen et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2015cv00460
Plaintiff:
Gillen, Scott Gillen and Veronica Gillen
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Hayden, Town of, Charles Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Gillen v. Wanker
as 3:2014cv00629
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gillen
Defendant:
Kimberly Wanker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillen v. Wanker
as 2:2014cv02042
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gillen
Defendant:
Kimberly Wanker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landrum et al v. Gillen et al
as 1:2014cv00785
Plaintiff:
Nicole Landrum and Jon Landrum
Defendant:
Michael Gillen and Trenton City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGEE v. BOROUGH OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN A. MCGEE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF CALIFORNIA , BOROUGH OF CALIFORNIA POLICE DEPARTMENT , TERRY CHILDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
POTTS v. BOROUGH OF CALIFORNIA, et al
as 2:2013cv01753
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH MICHELLE POTTS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF CALIFORNIA, , JEFFREY GILLEN and JOHN J. HACKINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of B.I.C., et al v. Gillen
as 13-3232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF B.I.C., a Minor Child, Deceased, LARRY F. CROSETTO, Individually and as Next Friend of C.S.C., a Minor Child and MARY LOU CROSETTO
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA GILLEN, Individually and as an agent of the Kansas Social and Rehabilitation Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
