Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Whitfield v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv01154
Plaintiff:
John Whitfield
Defendant:
Patricia Johnson, Jean King, Cori Rescigno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voss v. Ricketts et al
as 4:2015cv03137
Defendant:
Riko E. Bishop, Teresa Brown, Travis D. Hobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dewey Voss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olaniyi v. Mangum et al
as 4:2015cv03240
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Blair Olaniyi
Defendant:
Tully Mangum, Robert Hartfield and John J. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Paul v. Paul de Holczer
as 15-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD I. PAUL
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL D. DE HOLCZER, individually and as a partner of the law firm of Moses, Koon & Brackett, PC, MICHAEL H. QUINN, individually and as senior lawyer of Quinn Law Firm, LLC, J. CHARLES ORMOND, JR., individually and as partner of the Law Firm of Holler, Dennis, Corbett, ,Ormond, Plante & Garner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moors et al v. The City of Lakeland, Florida et al
as 8:2015cv01819
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Moors and Judy L. Moors
Defendant:
City of Lakeland, Florida , Richard Rose and John Does
Movant:
Harold Lehman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. NLS et al
as 1:2015cv05611
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Moore
Defendant:
NLS , Richard Smith , Chicago Public Library Talking Book Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul v. de Holczer et al
as 3:2015cv02178
Plaintiff:
Ronald I Paul
Defendant:
Paul D de Holczer, Michael H Quinn, J Charles Ormond, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
