Cases 31 - 40 of 41
REEVES v. COUNTY COLLEGE OF MORRIS et al
as 2:2008cv05646
Defendant:
COUNTY COLLEGE OF MORRIS, GENE VAN DER TOORN, JOHN YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN REEVES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Presley, et al
as 08-4144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST JOHN YOUNG, AKA Jason Aaron Presley
Defendant - Appellee:
ELVIS A. PRESLEY, LISA PRESLEY, ELVIS PRESLEY, INC. and others
Chu et al v. Young et al
as 1:2008cv02960
Plaintiff:
Ti-Yin Chu and Gary Chuang
Defendant:
John Young, Department of City Planning, Waldheim Neighborhood Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pryer v. Barbour, et al
as 08-60632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY G. PRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
HALEY BARBOUR, Mississippi Governor, individually and in official capacity, JIM HOOD, Mississippi Attorney General, individually and in official capacity, PAUL S FUNDERBURK, Judge, individually and in official capacity and others
Young v. Presley et al
as 2:2008cv00281
Plaintiff:
Ernest John Young
Defendant:
Elvis A. Presley, Lisa M. Presley, Elvis Presley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
John Young v. Aron Wolfe et al
as 2:2007cv03190
Plaintiff:
John Young
Defendant:
Aron Wolfe, Sr, Shannon, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
