Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Gaskins v. Johnson et al
as 4:2018cv02194
Defendant:
State of New Jersey, Judge Harold U Johnson, Jr, Charles L Walker, III and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Gaskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Margaret-Ilene Pullen v. Chuck Allen, et al
as 17-17475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET-ILENE PULLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK ALLEN, BIGGAR, BOB BRADUS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01738
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Potter v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2017cv10706
Plaintiff:
Jerome Potter
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , Brian Herndon , Lakena Crespo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Driskell v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2016cv02693
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Driskell
Defendant:
State of Colorado, County of El Paso, El Paso County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Allen et al
as 3:2016cv00551
Defendant:
Chuck Allen, Biggar, Bob Bradus and others
Inkov:
Petre
Plaintiff:
Margaret-ilene Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
O'Sullivan et al v. Walker et al
as 8:2016cv01281
Plaintiff:
Laura H.G. O'Sullivan , Deborah K. Curran , Erin M. Brady and others
Defendant:
Alphonso Walker and Novella L Walker
Movant:
Ventures Trust 2013 I-NH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kersten v. State of California Franchise Tax Board, et al
as 2:2016cv00309
Defendant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board, California Department of Consumer Affairs, Dental Board of California and others
Plaintiff:
Kersten and Timothy A. Kersten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
