Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
as 3:2010cv01628
Plaintiff:
Novella Robinson
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01654
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
H & J Consulting Services, et al v. City of Gainesville
as 10-12430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
H & J CONSULTING SERVICES, a Georgia limited liability corporation, d.b.a. Alpha House For Men, d.b.a. Travelers Indemnity Company, CSJ RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC., a Georgia S Corporation, d.b.a. Agora House for Men, RICK MARTIN, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF GAINESVILLE, a body corporate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gobeyn v. Travelers Indemnity Company
as 1:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gary Gobeyn and Gary Gobeyn
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
