Cases 31 - 40 of 904
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SWINT v. PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Defendant:
PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL, AGENT, MASTER, PROTECTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Swint v. Jurassic World, et al
as 23-2949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert James Swint
Defendant / Appellee:
Jurassic World, Verizon Wireless and Department of Defense
Armstrong v. The United States Federal Government et al
as 4:2023cv04139
Plaintiff:
Ryan Christopher Armstrong
Defendant:
The United States Federal Government, The State of Illinois, Kwame Raoul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sheila Halousek v. Verizon
as 23-16101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA HALOUSEK
Defendant / Appellee:
VERIZON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Swint v. Dish Network, et al
as 23-4098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Defendant / Appellee:
DISH NETWORK, VERIZON WIRELESS, BANK OF AMERICA and others
HINES v. VERIZON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
as 3:2023cv03805
Plaintiff:
DASHON HINES
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cuara Rodriguez v. Verizons et al
as 2:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara Rodriguez
Defendant:
Verizons, Jefferson Capital System and Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
